September 17, 2026
My first column in the Springfield Republican As it turns out, someone knew. Rachel Carson wrote in 1962 “that the New World has featured a series of tragedies: an atomic arms race, changes to the earth’s climate, and, everywhere in the industrialized world, pollution, deforestation, and the eradication of wildlife species and habitats.” “It is only within the moment of time represented by the twentieth century that one species—man—has acquired significant power to alter the nature of his world, and it is only within the past twenty-five years that this power has achieved such magnitude that it endangers the whole earth and its life.” She could have been writing about AI.
three years ago on September 24, 2023. It was titled “AI Tornado Will Shake Us To Our Foundation.” The gist of the column was that AI was going to reshape almost every aspect of our lives including medicine, law, education, shopping, finance and more. With the benefit of hindsight and given today’s news, I didn’t go nearly far enough. I didn’t know, and apparently many people a lot smarter than me didn’t know either, that AI in less than a generation could be responsible for the extinction of the human race. AI is now mentioned in the same sentences as nuclear weapons. Who knew?
Jill Lepore recently gave a presentation at the Springfield Public Forum as part of her tour promoting her new book “The Rise and Fall of the Artificial State.” Some people have referred to her as a “national treasure.” She is an American historian and journalist. She is the David Woods Kemper ’41 Professor of American History at Harvard University, and a staff writer at The New Yorker, where she has contributed since 2005. She writes about American history, law, literature, and politics. She grew up in West Boylston, a small town outside of Worcester, Massachusetts. In 2026, her book, “We the People,” which is about our Constitution, won the Pulitzer Prize for history.
She says that the impact that AI will have on society is a major problem that our leaders seem to be totally unable or unwilling to deal with. David Sanger reports in The New York Times that “The mismatch is striking. On one side, warnings of existential risk, maybe a 10% chance of the end of civilization. On the other, government paralysis.” Several tech executives have issued warnings, but nothing appears to be happening. Jason Coxon of Anthropic resigned, and issued what was essentially a whistleblower report. Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, called for a global slowdown. Elon Musk said that Dario was correct. In fact, in September 2014, Elon Musk, in a forum at MIT, described a rogue AI as the “biggest existential threat” to humanity. “Increasingly scientists think there should be some regulatory oversight, maybe at the national and international level, just to make sure that we don’t do something very foolish,” he said.” Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, chimed in as well.
Lepore goes on to say in her book that “by the middle of the 2020s, vastly consequential decisions about the future of Earth and everyone and everything on it were being made by a handful of men based on their colossal accumulation of wealth, their catastrophic misreading of history, literature, and philosophy, and their breathtaking contempt for ordinary people, living and dead.” When OpenAI launched ChatGPT, the AI race began. Earlier Silicon Valley concerns about climate change and pledges to lowering carbon emissions were left behind. The tech oligarchs found a sympathetic ear in Donald Trump and contributed heavily to his campaign focused on laissez-faire capitalism and minimal regulation. Trump said he alone would be a sufficient guardrail against rogue artificial intelligence just as he said in 2016 that he alone could fix the U.S. economy. Trump posted, “The only control or “guardrails” that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the USA has that in spades.” Trump for his part is focused on winning AI, whatever that means, and beating the Chinese. Estimates put our lead over China at six months. This will surely evaporate. Critics are asking if this “arms race” is worth it if it means the end of humanity. Voters are asking if this is worth it if it means the end to their communities, higher utility bills, the destruction of the natural environment, and the end of the world.
We have a framework for controlling nuclear weapons if we choose to take advantage of it. We know where they are, how many there are, and how to dismantle them. It’s a political problem, not a technical problem. We don’t have a similar framework for AI. The control of artificial intelligence is both a technical problem and political problem. It can be weaponized by both state and non-state actors. It may be beyond our human intelligence to grasp. According to Lepore, the many young people who come out to see her as she travels the college circuit tell her that social media stole their childhoods, and AI now threatens to steal the rest of their lives. Who knew?